Image slider test
I've grabbed the image slider code from https://clamtech.org to do my own comparisons. Here's a demo:
nvencuhq#
/out_out_uhq_qp51.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=51, 0.24 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-63.19
/out_out_uhq_qp48.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=48, 0.30 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-59.74
/out_out_uhq_qp45.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=45, 0.37 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-54.26
/out_out_uhq_qp42.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=42, 0.48 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-47.16
/out_out_uhq_qp39.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=39, 0.64 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-38.17
/out_out_uhq_qp36.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=36, 0.88 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-22.78
/out_out_uhq_qp33.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=33, 1.22 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=-8.12
/out_out_uhq_qp30.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=30, 1.72 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=8.55
/out_out_uhq_qp27.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=27, 2.41 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=23.77
/out_out_uhq_qp-1.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=adaptive, 2.62 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=28.98
/out_out_uhq_qp24.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=24, 3.53 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=38.37
/out_out_uhq_qp21.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=21, 4.98 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=48.60
/out_out_uhq_qp18.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=18, 7.32 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=58.17
/out_out_uhq_qp15.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=15, 11.37 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=65.34
/out_out_uhq_qp12.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=12, 18.09 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=70.83
/out_out_uhq_qp9.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=9, 27.64 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=74.74
/out_out_uhq_qp6.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=6, 41.38 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=76.37
/out_out_uhq_qp3.mkv.png|NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti, p7 tune=uhq, \n CQP=3, 55.07 Mbps, SSIMULACRA2=74.67